Legal Opinion

Kittinger v. Churchill Evangelistic Ass'n

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 25, 1934PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHarris, J.

The complaint herein prays for judgment that the court construe, ascertain and determine whether or not an alleged voting trust agreement therein referred to is valid, legal and subsisting, and if so, the rights, powers and duties of the trustees thereunder, and that the plaintiff be determined to be a voting trustee under such agreement. The relief sought is in the form of a declaratory judgment.

Prior to the trial of this action, the defendant association moved at Special Term for a dismissal of the plaintiff’s complaint on the ground that the plaintiff had no capacity to sue. Favorable…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kittinger v. Churchill Evangelistic Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
  2. In re Election of Directors of Germicide Co.New York Supreme Court · 1892
  3. William Randall & Sons, Inc. v. LuckeNew York Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Perry v. Missouri-Kansas Pipe Line Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1937
  2. Edward A. Martin v. Graybar Electric Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1961
  3. Adams v. Clearance Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1955
  4. Kittinger v. Churchill Evangelistic Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
  5. Adams v. CLEARANCE CORPORATIONCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1955

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API