Legal Opinion

Kittinger v. Churchill Evangelistic Ass'n

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 15, 1935PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment so far as appealed from affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: In affirming this judgment, we do not interpret it as constituting an adjudiea*877tion of the character of stock ownership by the plaintiff, the defendant Clinton H. Churchill, or the representatives of Sarah H. Churchill, in The Churchill Evangelistic Association, Inc. All concur. (The judgment decrees the proportionate ownership of shares on expiration of a voting trust agreement.) Present — Sears, P. J., Edgcomb, Thompson, Crosby and Lewis, JJ. [151 Misc. 350.]

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kittinger v. Churchill Evangelistic Ass'nNew York Supreme Court · 1934

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wygod v. Makewell Hats, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942