Legal Opinion

Medford Co-operative Bank v. Skerry

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided August 12, 2004PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMerrick, P.J.

After a trial without a jury, judgment was entered for the defendant on his counterclaims for abuse of process and G.L.c. 93A unfair and deceptive practices. The plaintiff tiled this Dist./Mun. Cts. R. A. D. A., Rule 8C, appeal of the denial of its Mass. R. Civ. P., Rule 41(b)(2), motion for involuntary dismissal of the defendant’s counterclaims. As the plaintiff challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support the court’s judgment, we view the evidence in the light most favorable to the defendant for the purposes of this appeal. Edwards v. Sullivan and Cogliano Co., 2002 Mass. App. Div.…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Fishman v. BrooksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
  2. Raunela v. Hertz Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
  3. Beecy v. PucciarelliMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  4. Gutierrez v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
  5. Gallant v. WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Estate of Bryant v. BryantMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2010
  2. Shade v. Athena Equipment & Supply, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2010
  3. Zimbovsky v. TokarMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2005
  4. Valente v. Stop & Shop Supermarket Co.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API