Legal Opinion

Guardianship of McConnell

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 22, 1938No. Civ. 11712PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhite, J.

After proceedings for that purpose duly had, Emmet McConnell was declared to be incompetent. From the order appointing William A. Cochran guardian of his person and estate, McConnell has appealed.

Appellant’s first contention is that the petition by which these proceedings were initiated is fatally defective, by rea son of which the superior court was without jurisdiction to hear or determine the matter of his incompetency. The petition in question alleged, among other things, that Mr. McConnell was about ninety years of age; that he was suffering from cataracts, arteriosclerosis, and senile…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re the Guardianship of CoburnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Schulmeyer v. McAllisterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Estate of ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  4. In Re TiltonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. AT&T Mobility, LLC v. YeagerDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2015
  2. Board of Trustees v. PoriniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  3. MacKechnie v. OliverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Guardianship of WaltersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  5. In Re Heath. Heath v. ArnovitzUtah Supreme Court · 1942

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API