Legal Opinion

In Re Heath. Heath v. Arnovitz

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 1942No. 6268PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from a decree of the lower court adjudging that Joseph A. Heath is an incompetent, and appointing a guardian for his person and estate.

The petition was filed by an attorney who signed himself as attorney-in-fact for some of the heirs of Joseph A. Heath. He signed the names of the respondents to the petition. Appellants give five particulars in which they believe the lower court committed error. We recite them as they appear in appellants’ brief:

Statement of the Particular Questions Involved

1. Does the petition state facts sufficient to authorize the relief prayed for?

2.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re the Guardianship of CoburnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Schulmeyer v. McAllisterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  3. O'Reilly v. McLeanUtah Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Guardianship of McConnellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  5. Estate of ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re BoyerUtah Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Home Town Finance Corporation v. FrankUtah Supreme Court · 1962
  3. In Re the Guardianship of ValentineUtah Supreme Court · 1956
  4. In re the Guardianship of KeslerUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  5. González Hernández v. González HernándezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 2011

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API