Legal Opinion
AT&T Mobility, LLC v. Yeager
District Court, E.D. California
Decided November 10, 2015No. 2:13-cv-0007-KJM-DADPublishedCited by 109 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Kimberly J. Mueller, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
On September 14, 2015, the court held an evidentiary hearing on the question of the competency of General Charles E. “Chuck” Yeager (Ret.) to proceed in this case without representation. General Yeager and Victoria Yeager appeared without counsel at that hearing, General Yeager representing himself and Victoria Yeager representing herself. Kennedy Luvai appeared by telephone on behalf of interve-nor Parsons Behle & Latimer. For the following reasons, the court finds it must *1045appoint a guardian ad litem to protect General Yeager’s interests…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Whitmore Ex Rel. Simmons v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- C.E. Pope Equity Trust v. United States of America, Richard L. Stradley, Trustee, Etc. v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- United States v. 30.64 Acres of Land, More or Less, Situated in Klickitat County, State of Washington, and James StarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Johns v. County of San DiegoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Dionisio v. Dacanay and Reynaldo C. Dacanay, by His Father and Next Friend v. Saturnina Mendoza, Victor P. Mendoza, and Doe Insurance Co. No. 1Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by109 opinions
- In re Fairbanks Co.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 2019
- (HC) Yocom v. AllisonDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
- (PC) Bennett v. Monroe Detention CenterDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
- (PC) Davis v. BainesDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
- (PC) Dillingham v. EmersonDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
104 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.