Legal Opinion

People v. Roldan

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 7, 1985PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*822OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Div ision should be affirmed.

Defendant held three people hostage in an apartment building lobby by threatening them with ai large knife while demanding that the police secure him transportation to Puerto Rico where his mother lived. While this behavior may have been bizarre and unlikely to succeed, the jury could still conclude based on Dr. Herman’s testimony, beyond a reasonable doubt, that defendant had substantial capacity to know or appreciate the nature and consequences of his conduct and that the conduct was wrong (cf. People v…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. BaldiNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. People v. WoffordNew York Court of Appeals · 1979

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. AlomarNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. People v. LaracuenteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  3. People v. GrinanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  4. People v. FraleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  5. People v. KroemerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API