Legal Opinion
United States v. Rogers
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided June 15, 2004No. 03-4153PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MURPHY, Circuit Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
The district court concluded that the United States was not entitled to an 18 U.S.C. § 3142 hearing to determine whether the defendant-appellee, Kenneth Rogers, should be detained pending trial on charges of possession of a firearm while subject to a protection order, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(8), and possession of a firearm following a misdemeanor conviction of domestic violence, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(9). According to the district court, the crimes set out in Rogers’ indictment were not “crime[s] of violence” within the meaning of 18…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. EmersonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Miguel Trinidad-AquinoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Jose Prisciliano Gracia-CantuCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
- Jose A. Bazan-Reyes, Wincenty Z. MacIasowicz and Arnoldo Gomez-Vela v. Immigration and Naturalization Service and John D. AshcroftCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Singleton, Carlos T.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- United States v. Al-RekabiCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. SerafinCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- Commonwealth v. YoungMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009
- In re United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Fred NobrigaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.