United States v. Al-Rekabi
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
O’BRIEN, Circuit Judge.
A jury convicted Haydar Hameed Al-Rekabi of possession of a stolen firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(j). The district court instructed on constructive possession but refused necessity and fleeting possession instructions. Al-Rekabi argues the trial court’s use of constructive possession was too expansive and its view of justification defenses too restrictive. In affirming, we clarify the role of constructive possession and urge the parsimonious use of justification instructions.
Background
The preliminary facts are undisputed. On February 16, 2002, when Al-Rekabi’s…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- United States v. BaileySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. Oakland Cannabis Buyers' CooperativeSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- United States v. RutherfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Dixon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- United States v. Martin Cardenas, A/K/A Raul RamirezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Henderson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- United States v. GallantCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- Government of the Virgin Islands v. LewisCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- United States v. CorneliusCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- State v. RudolfoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2008
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.