Legal Opinion
State v. Navarro
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided November 12, 1932PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDunn, J.
The respondent was tried and convicted upon an indictment under a statute which provided as follows:
“Whoever forcibly rescues a prisoner lawfully detained for any criminal offense; ... or in any way aids him to escape, ... or with a design to aid the prisoner in his escape, harbors; or with such design in any way assists such prisoner who has escaped, or is at large, shall be punished,. . .” R. S., Chap. 133, Sec. 17.
The indictment alleged that the respondent, at Portland, on the fifteenth day of April, a.d. 1932, “did feloniously aid and assist John J. O’Donnell and Emery Leo to escape and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. PerleySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1894
- State v. KopelowSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1927
- State v. BeattieSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1930
- State v. CrouseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1918
- Commonwealth v. MorseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1806
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. CharetteSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1963
- State v. StroutSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1933
- State v. BeySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1965
- State v. SchneiderWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
- State v. MichaudSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1955
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.