State v. Bey
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the CourtMarden, J.
On exceptions. A jury found the appellant guilty of assault and battery. The presiding justice found that the assault and battery was of a high and aggravated nature and sentenced accordingly.
Appellant purports to come to this court on exceptions and appeal. He assigns as exceptions:
1. That the verdict was against the evidence.
2. That the verdict was against the weight of the evidence, and
3. That the finding by the presiding justice that the offense was of a high and aggravated nature, was erroneous as a matter of law.
The record indicates, and indeed counsel concedes, that no exceptions were…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. City of PortlandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1949
- State v. McKrackernSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1945
- Rell v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1939
- State v. NavarroSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1932
- State v. BernatchezSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1963
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- State v. DavenportSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1974
- State v. HealdSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
- State v. RoweSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1968
- Dow v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1971
- State v. FerrisSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1969
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.