Legal Opinion

Michelle Rahla v. Medical Center at Bowling Green

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided March 17, 2016No. 2014-SC-000236-WCUnknownCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

CHIEF JUSTICE MINTON

When a former employee makes a claim for benefits under Kentucky’s Workers’ Compensation Act, she must first establish she was employed when the injury took place, 1 Michelle Rahla sought workers’ compensation benefits from the Medical Center at Bowling Green (Medical Center) for injuries she allegedly sustained during the course of a pre-employment physical examination. Her claim has been summarily rejected at every stage in the review process because she was not considered actually “employed” by the Medical Center when she submitted to the physical…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Shelton v. Kentucky Easter Seals Society, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Vessels Ex Rel. Vessels v. Brown-Forman Distillers Corp.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Kentucky Farm & Power Equipment Dealers Ass'n v. Fulkerson Bros., Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Honaker v. Duro Bag Manufacturing Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Hubbard v. HenryKentucky Supreme Court · 2007

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. James Ray Foley v. Pegasus transportation/crst InternationalCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2022
  2. James Ray Foley v. Pegasus transportation/crst InternationalKentucky Supreme Court · 2023
  3. Sherring v. Indus. Comm'n of Ariz.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API