Legal Opinion

Hubbard v. Henry

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided August 23, 2007No. 2006-SC-000750-WCPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

KRS 342.640 lists various kinds of workers that Chapter 342 considers to be employees. The claimant’s injuries occurred while he was working for Bobby Hubbard d/b/a B & H Logging, without pay, in order to demonstrate his ability as a timber cutter before being hired. An Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) dismissed his application for benefits after finding that he had not been hired, was not working under an implied contract of hire and,therefore, was not an employee as defined by KRS 342.640(1). The Workers* Compensation Board (Board) held that a worker injured while…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ratliff v. RedmonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1965
  2. Claim of Smith v. Venezian Lamp Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957
  3. Elkhorn-Hazard Coal Land Corp. v. TaylorKentucky Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Tackett v. Lagrange PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1975
  5. Kentucky Farm & Power Equipment Dealers Ass'n v. Fulkerson Bros., Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pike County Board of Education v. MillsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2008
  2. Michelle Rahla v. Medical Center at Bowling GreenKentucky Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Commonwealth, Uninsured Employers' Fund v. GusslerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2008
  4. James Ray Foley v. Pegasus transportation/crst InternationalCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2022
  5. James Ray Foley v. Pegasus transportation/crst InternationalKentucky Supreme Court · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API