Legal Opinion

Honaker v. Duro Bag Manufacturing Co.

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 1993No. 92-SC-733-WCPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

The sole issue involved in this workers’ compensation appeal is whether claimant’s *482actions and misrepresentations in securing employment with the Duro Bag Manufacturing Company (Duro) preclude him from maintaining a claim for workers’ compensation for an injury sustained while at work.

In 1977, claimant was given a medical discharge from the United States Army after he injured his back on a parachute jump. He received a 10% disability from the Veterans Administration which was later raised to 20%. Claimant has undergone occasional treatment at veterans’ hospitals since his…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. A. L. Pickens Company, Inc. v. Youngstown Sheet & Tube CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
  2. M.J. Daly Co. v. VarneyKentucky Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Rice v. ConleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1967

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Toyota Motor Manufacturing, U.S.A., Inc. v. EppersonKentucky Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Divita v. Hopple PlasticsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1993
  3. Baptist Hospital East v. PossanzaKentucky Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Michelle Rahla v. Medical Center at Bowling GreenKentucky Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Clarion Manufacturing Corp. of America v. JusticeKentucky Supreme Court · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API