Krook v. Blomberg
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtKenison, J.
As early as 1860 and quite consistently since that time it has been the practice in this state “ . . . that the court may make such orders in each case, from time to time, as justice may require.” Deming v. Foster, 42 N. H. 165, 179; LaCoss v. Lebanon, 78 N. H. 413, 417; Dame v. Seaward, ante, 125. The rationale of our practice has been well expressed in Taylor v. Thomas, 77 N. H. 410, 411: “But as the law is now administered, there is no such thing as property in a piece of evidence. It is now universally recognized that the object of a trial is to ascertain the truth by rational means. The…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Sibbach v. Wilson & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Stack v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
3Cited by2 opinions
- Timpte v. District Court in and for City and County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1966
- Newton v. CeasarCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000