Legal Opinion

Krook v. Blomberg

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided June 1, 1948No. 3732PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKenison, J.

As early as 1860 and quite consistently since that time it has been the practice in this state “ . . . that the court may make such orders in each case, from time to time, as justice may require.” Deming v. Foster, 42 N. H. 165, 179; LaCoss v. Lebanon, 78 N. H. 413, 417; Dame v. Seaward, ante, 125. The rationale of our practice has been well expressed in Taylor v. Thomas, 77 N. H. 410, 411: “But as the law is now administered, there is no such thing as property in a piece of evidence. It is now universally recognized that the object of a trial is to ascertain the truth by rational means. The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sibbach v. Wilson & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Stack v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Timpte v. District Court in and for City and County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1966
  2. Newton v. CeasarCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API