Legal Opinion
Gatz v. Ponsoldt
Supreme Court of Delaware
Decided April 16, 2007No. 298,2006PublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JACOBS, Justice.
The plaintiffs-below, appellants (“Appellants”), who are minority public stockholders of Regency Affiliates, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Regency”), appeal from the dismissal of this action by the Court of Chancery. The complaint, which Appellants brought on behalf of all Regency shareholders other than the defendants and affiliated persons, alleges claims arising out of several transactions that occurred between 1992 and 2004. This appeal involves dismissed claims generated by two of those transactions: the “Recapitalization,” which occurred in 2002, and the “Aggregate…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Commissioner v. Court Holding Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Brehm v. EisnerSupreme Court of Delaware · 2000
- Malpiede v. TownsonSupreme Court of Delaware · 2001
- Griffiths v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Revlon, Inc. v. MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1986
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- F5 Capital v. PappasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017
- Feldman v. CutaiaSupreme Court of Delaware · 2008
- Feeley v. Nhaocg, LLCCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2012
- El Paso Pipeline GP Company, LLC v. BrinckerhoffSupreme Court of Delaware · 2016
- Carsanaro v. Bloodhound Technologies, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2013
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.