Legal Opinion

City of Los Angeles v. Morris

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 30, 1925No. Docket No. 4989PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConrey, P. J.

This action was brought by the plaintiff to condemn land and take the same for public use for the opening, widening and extending of Fifth Street in the city of Los Angeles. The defendant Annie F. Young is the owner of land through which the extended street will run. Under the condemnation proceedings she is entitled to compensation for that part of her land taken for street purposes, and separately to compensation for damages to her adjoining land not taken for the public use. She appeals from the interlocutory judgment, entered pursuant to the verdict of a jury which assessed said…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. NakisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. People v. PompaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Marin Mun. Water Dist. v. Marin Water & Power Co.California Supreme Court · 1918

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. City of Pleasant Hill v. First Baptist ChurchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  2. People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. MurataCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Garcia v. HoffmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. Miller v. Dollar Steamship Lines, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1937
  5. Young v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API