Legal Opinion

Young v. City of Los Angeles

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 11, 1927No. Docket Nos. 5525, 5526PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWorks, P. J.

The second cause above entitled, City of Los Angeles v. Morris, No. 5526 in the files of this court, is an action for the condemnation of real property for street purposes. It was commenced pursuant to the provisions of an act of the legislature commonly known as the act of 1903 (Stats. 1903, p. 376; and, as variously amended, Act 8198, Deering’s Gen. Laws 1923), and such proceedings were had that an interlocutory decree of condemnation was entered in the action. From this decree the defendant Annie F. Young, appellant here, in due time prosecuted an appeal and the interlocutory decree was…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Embury v. . ConnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1850
  2. Reaugh v. Cudahy Packing Co.California Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Varcoe v. LeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Sherman v. . McKeonNew York Court of Appeals · 1868
  5. Kile v. Town of YellowheadIllinois Supreme Court · 1875

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Sea World Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  2. Donegan v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  3. Yavitch v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  4. McLaughlin v. FollendorfIndiana Court of Appeals · 1955
  5. E. M. v. Varsity Brands, LLCDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2024

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API