Legal Opinion

Watkins v. Arnold

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 18, 1933No. 4328PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SELLERS, Justice.

The appellant, Jake L. Watkins, brought this suit against the appellee, J. E. Arnold,, to enforce specific performance of a contract entered into between them on August 24,. 192S,. by which appellee, among other things, gave appellant an option to purchase 43% acres of land, a part of the T. H. Smith survey located about 9 miles northwest of Henderson in Rusk county, Tex. The contract sued upon is set out as follows: •

“State of Texas County of Rusk.
“We, J. E. Arnold and Jake L. Watkins, hereby make and enter into the following agreement for the use, rent and occupancy by Jake…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Adams v. HughesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
  2. Bullis v. Presidio Mining Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1889

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Gulf Production Co. v. Continental Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Dracopoulas v. RachalTexas Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Joiner v. Elrod, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1986
  4. Little v. Employees Security Life Ins. CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961
  5. Davis v. FreemanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API