Legal Opinion

Benn v. Linden Crane Company

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided December 28, 1973No. Civ. A. 70-542PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SUPPLEMENTAL OPINION AND ORDER

VanARTSDALEN, District Judge.

On February 22, 1968, plaintiff, Clifford Benn, a Pennsylvania citizen, was injured while working at a construction jobsite in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Alleging malfunction of a tower crane as the cause of his injury, plaintiff instituted suit in this district court against several defendants, including Linden-Alimak, the asserted manufacturer of the crane. Linden-Alimak is neither incorporated under the laws of Pennsylvania nor registered to do business in the state. It is a foreign corporation incorporated under the laws of…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Columbia Metal Culvert Co. v. Kaiser Industries Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
  2. Kitzinger v. Gimbel Bros., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Crucible, Inc. v. Stora Kopparbergs Bergslags ABDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. In Re Windbrooke Development Corporation, Bankrupt. Windbrooke Development Corporation v. Environmental Enterprises, Inc., of Fla.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
  5. Inpaco, Inc. v. McDonald's Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1976

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API