Legal Opinion
Inpaco, Inc. v. McDonald's Corp.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided January 9, 1976No. Civ. A. 74-1251PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DITTER, District Judge.
Rather than “doing it all for you,” McDonald’s Corporation claims in a motion now before the court that it does nothing for anybody in Pennsylvania. Believing its ad men have assessed the situation more accurately than its lawyers, I deny McDonald’s motion to dismiss this diversity action for lack of jurisdiction.
The plaintiff, Inpaco, Inc., instituted suit against McDonald’s Corporation for breach of an alleged contract under the terms of which the defendant agreed to purchase a food sauce dispensing system to be designed by plaintiff for use in McDonald’s…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- In-Flight Devices Corporation v. Van Dusen Air, Incorporated, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1972
- Proctor & Schwartz, Inc. v. Cleveland Lumber Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Myers v. Mooney Aircraft, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- DiCesare-Engler Productions, Inc. v. Mainman Ltd.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1979
- Jacobs v. Lakewood Aircraft Service, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
- George A. Davis, Inc. v. Camp Trails Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1978
- Galaxy International, Inc. v. White Stores, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
- Watson McDaniel Co. v. National Pump & Control, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1979
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.