Legal Opinion
Crucible, Inc. v. Stora Kopparbergs Bergslags AB
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided October 29, 1975No. Civ. A. 74-917PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TEITELBAUM, District Judge.
This action for patent infringement under Title 35, United States Code is presently before the Court on a question of jurisdiction.
Defendant Stora Kopparbergs Bergs-lags AB (Stora-Sweden), a Swedish corporation maintaining no established place of business in Pennsylvania and not registered to do business in the state, has moved under Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to dismiss the complaint — alleging infringement of two United States patents owned by plaintiff covering powder metallurgy high-speed tool steels — on grounds that defendant is not…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Perkins v. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Cannon Manufacturing Co. v. Cudahy Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Brunette MacHine Works, Ltd. v. Kockum Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Rockwell International Corp. v. Costruzioni Aeronautiche Giovanni AgustaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
- Superior Coal Co. v. Ruhrkohle A.G.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1979
- Hicks v. Kawasaki Heavy IndustriesDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1978
- United States v. Toyota Motor Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 1983
- Waters v. Deutz Corp.Superior Court of Delaware · 1983
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.