Legal Opinion
State v. Clary
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided April 9, 1991No. 90AP-1248PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Petree, Judge.
Defendant Charles Clary was convicted by a jury in the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas of the crime of rape. Defendant asserts the following assignments of error:
“I. Appellant was denied effective assistance of counsel as guaranteed by the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States and by Article I, Section 10 of the Constitution of the State of Ohio through counsel’s failure to move to dismiss on the grounds that appellant was denied his right to a speedy trial.
“II. The trial court erred by permitting the state to introduce hearsay testimony…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- State v. DehassOhio Supreme Court · 1967
- State v. LytleOhio Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. EleyOhio Supreme Court · 1978
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State of Iowa v. Judith Renae UtterSupreme Court of Iowa · 2011
- State v. RobersonOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
- State v. ElliottOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
- State v. HazelOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
- State v. ReynoldsOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.