Legal Opinion

Romeo v. Department of Employment & Training

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided December 23, 1988No. 87-245PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDooley, J.

Claimant appeals pro se from an Employment Security Board decision affirming the denial of unemployment benefits because of misconduct connected with his work. See 21 V.S.A. § 1344(a)(1). The misconduct concerned allegations that claimant had taken approximately ten newspapers from a vending machine in downtown Burlington. At a hearing before the chief appeals referee, claimant denied he took the newspapers. The referee, however, sustained the denial because he gave greater credence to testimony identifying claimant’s taxicab by number as the one involved in the alleged theft, together with…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Darken v. MooneySupreme Court of Vermont · 1984
  2. LYNDONVILLE SAVINGS BANK & T. CO. v. Peerless Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1967
  3. Porter v. Department of Employment SecuritySupreme Court of Vermont · 1981
  4. Whitcomb v. Department of Employment & TrainingSupreme Court of Vermont · 1986
  5. Perry v. Department of Employment & TrainingSupreme Court of Vermont · 1987

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Coleman v. Anne Arundel County Police DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  2. Maryland Board of Physicians v. ElliottCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API