Legal Opinion
LYNDONVILLE SAVINGS BANK & T. CO. v. Peerless Ins. Co.
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided October 3, 1967No. 204PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
This action was brought by the plaintiff bank against the defendant insurance company upon a. standard form of “Banker’s Blanket Bond” issued by the defendant to the plaintiff. The clause of the bond upon which recovery is sought is loss of property suffered by the bank by means of “robbery, burglary, common-law or statutory larceny, theft, false pretenses, holdup” and the like.
The bank complains that while the policy was in full force and effect that one John T. Dowd by means of “larceny and false pretenses” obtained the sum of $4,000.00 from the bank. The undisputed evidence is that the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Spaulding v. Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1920
- Leno v. MeunierSupreme Court of Vermont · 1965
- Livanovitch v. LivanovitchSupreme Court of Vermont · 1926
- New England Acceptance Corp. v. NicholsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1939
- Pacific Lumber Agency v. National Aircraft Materials Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1936
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- In Re SmithSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
- Chittenden Trust Co. v. Mayo (In Re Mayo)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Vermont · 1988
- Wheeler v. Central Vermont Medical Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1990
- Cheever v. AlbroSupreme Court of Vermont · 1980
- Bardill Land & Lumber, Inc. v. DavisSupreme Court of Vermont · 1977
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.