Legal Opinion

Darken v. Mooney

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided June 29, 1984No. 82-110PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.

This is a boundary dispute between adjoining property owners in the village of Woodstock. The Darkens brought an action in Windsor Superior Court seeking a declaratory judgment as well as a permanent injunction. Defendant Mooney counterclaimed on the basis of adverse possession; he claims title to a portion of plaintiffs’ property by adverse use for a period in excess of fifteen years. After hearing, the presiding judge established a boundary line and issued a permanent injunction in favor of plaintiffs.

Defendant advances four arguments on appeal. He argues that: (1) the trial court’s denial…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Kotz v. KotzSupreme Court of Vermont · 1975
  2. Stamato v. QuazzoSupreme Court of Vermont · 1980
  3. R. Brown & Sons, Inc. v. International Harvester Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1982
  4. Okemo Mountain, Inc. v. Okemo Trailside Condominiums, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1981
  5. Claude G. Dern Electric, Inc. v. BernsteinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Bruntaeger v. ZellerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1986
  2. Harlow v. MillerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1986
  3. Richwagen v. RichwagenSupreme Court of Vermont · 1989
  4. Sutfin v. SouthworthSupreme Court of Vermont · 1987
  5. McCormick v. McCormickSupreme Court of Vermont · 1988

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API