Legal Opinion

Jones v. City of Modesto

District Court, E.D. California

Decided December 16, 2005No. CVF04-5614AWIDLBPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE SUMMARY ADJUDICATION

ISHII, District Judge.

This civil rights action arises from Defendants’ summary suspension of Plaintiffs massage therapist license and massage establishment license. The court has jurisdiction over the civil rights claims pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331 and supplemental jurisdiction over the state law claim. Because the events underlying this action occurred in Modesto, California, venue is appropriate in this court. Pending before the court is Defendants’ motion…

2Cases cited65 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Berjikian v. Franchise Tax BoardDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2015
  2. (PS) Ciurar v. SodergrenDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
  3. (PS) Ciurar v. SodergrenDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
  4. (PS) Ciurar v. SodergrenDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
  5. Beans & Rocks LLC v. Pacific CountyDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2022

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API