Legal Opinion

Berjikian v. Franchise Tax Board

District Court, C.D. California

Decided March 12, 2015No. Case No. CV 13-06301 DDP (JCGx)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

DEAN D. PREGERSON, District Judge.

Presently before the Court are the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. Having considered the submissions of the parties, the court grants Plaintiffs’ Motion, denies Defendants’ Motion, and adopts the following Order.

I. Background

California Revenue and Taxation Code Section 19195 directs the state’s Franchise Tax Board (“FTB”) to “make available as a matter of public record at least twice each calendar year a list of the 500 largest tax…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Shannon v. Commissioner of HousingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
  2. Shannon v. Commissioner of HousingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API