Legal Opinion

Jud v. City of San Antonio

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 30, 1958No. 3378PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRISSOM, Chief Justice.

Jud sued the City and others for a judgment that he was entitled to a pension as a fireman or the return of contributions to the pension fund. He alleged that when he filed suit he was then over fifty-five; that he had served with the San Antonio Fire Department more than twenty years and deductions were taken from his salary for the pension fund; that his services and contributions under the law that then existed entitled him to a pension or the return of contributions and that the Board of Pension Trustees had arbitrarily refused both. Defendants filed a motion for a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. City of Dallas v. TrammellTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Jud v. City of San AntonioTexas Supreme Court · 1945
  3. State Ex Rel. Palm v. City of BrazilIndiana Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Board of Trustees of the Firemen's Pension Fund v. State Ex Rel. FurgasonIndiana Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Reagan v. Board of Firemen, Policemen & Fire Alarm Operators' Pension Fund TrusteesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Klumb v. Houston Municipal Employees Pension SystemTexas Supreme Court · 2015
  2. State Ex Rel. Fox v. Board of Trustees of the Policemen's Pension or Relief FundWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Gould v. City of El PasoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969
  4. Horowitz v. Department of Retirement SystemsWashington Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Muzquiz v. City of San AntonioDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1974

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API