Jud v. City of San Antonio
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
GRISSOM, Chief Justice.
Jud sued the City and others for a judgment that he was entitled to a pension as a fireman or the return of contributions to the pension fund. He alleged that when he filed suit he was then over fifty-five; that he had served with the San Antonio Fire Department more than twenty years and deductions were taken from his salary for the pension fund; that his services and contributions under the law that then existed entitled him to a pension or the return of contributions and that the Board of Pension Trustees had arbitrarily refused both. Defendants filed a motion for a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- City of Dallas v. TrammellTexas Supreme Court · 1937
- Jud v. City of San AntonioTexas Supreme Court · 1945
- State Ex Rel. Palm v. City of BrazilIndiana Supreme Court · 1947
- Board of Trustees of the Firemen's Pension Fund v. State Ex Rel. FurgasonIndiana Supreme Court · 1933
- Reagan v. Board of Firemen, Policemen & Fire Alarm Operators' Pension Fund TrusteesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Klumb v. Houston Municipal Employees Pension SystemTexas Supreme Court · 2015
- State Ex Rel. Fox v. Board of Trustees of the Policemen's Pension or Relief FundWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1964
- Gould v. City of El PasoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969
- Horowitz v. Department of Retirement SystemsWashington Supreme Court · 1981
- Muzquiz v. City of San AntonioDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1974
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.