Horowitz v. Department of Retirement Systems
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtUtter, J.
This is a direct appeal from a trial court holding that a superior court judge who involuntarily discontinued judicial service prior to becoming eligible for retirement benefits does not have a right to a refund of his compulsory salary contributions.
Appellant Horowitz was appointed as a judge of the Superior Court for King County, effective January 1, 1974. Horowitz continued in office until January 10, 1977, when he left office after having been defeated in the September 1976 primary election.
A percentage of Horowitz' monthly salary was deducted and placed in the Judicial Retirement System…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bakenhus v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1956
- Kraus v. Board of Trustees of Police Pension FundAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
- City of Edmond v. WakefieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
- Bell v. Midland National Life Insurance CompanySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1960
- Derby v. Police Pension and Relief BoardSupreme Court of Colorado · 1966
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Retired Public Employees Council v. CharlesWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- Washington Federation of State Employees v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- INTER. ASS'N OF FIRE. v. Spokane AirportsWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- International Ass'n of Firefighters, Local 1789 v. Spokane AirportsWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- Wash. Fed'n of State Employees Council 28 v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1983
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.