Legal Opinion

Hardman v. Lasell

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 7, 1929No. File No. 6435PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FULLER, C.

After commencement of this action the respondent, Hardman, became receiver of the First National Bank of Waubay, which bank will be herein referred to as plaintiff and respondent. The suit was to quiet title to a certain residence property in Waubay, and for specific performance of a contract under which plaintiff claims to be entitled to deed. The defendants joined in the suit, and served with process, may be referred to as Bowler, Herold, and Lasell. Bowler and Herold defaulted. Lasell joined issue, defended the case, and from an adverse judgment, and order overruling' motion for…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Betts v. LetcherSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Johnson v. HoganMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Brady v. KreugerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1896
  4. McPherson v. SwiftSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Grigsby v. DaySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1897

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Dwyer v. ChristensenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Estate of AssmusSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Anderson v. AdamsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Hartman v. WoodSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Custer Co. Bd. of Ed. v. State Commission on Elementary & Secondary EducationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1972

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API