Legal Opinion
United States v. Radley
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided September 17, 2009No. Criminal Action H-08-411PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum Opinion and Order
GRAY H. MILLER, District Judge.
The United States charges four former employees of BP America Inc. in the twenty-six count superceding indictment. Defendants have filed four separate motions to dismiss the superceding indictment on three separate grounds (Dkts. 257, 259, 260, and 261). The court held a hearing on these motions on July 2, 2009. Having considered the motions, responses, arguments of counsel, and the applicable law, the court finds that all of defendants’ motions should be granted.
I. Factual Background
The following facts are alleged by the government…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. HarrissSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- United States v. PattenSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Schreiber v. Burlington Northern, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. James BrooksCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. Michael CosciaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
- U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Parnon Energy Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- United States v. RadleyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. CosciaDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2015
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.