Legal Opinion

United States v. Radley

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided January 27, 2011No. 09-20699PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDITH H. JONES, Chief Judge:

The United States appeals from the district court’s order dismissing the indictment of Appellees for wire fraud and violations of the Commodities Exchange Act (CEA), 7 U.S.C. § 13(a)(2). Because Appellees’ conduct fell within a statutory exemption for off-exchange commodities transactions, we affirm the dismissal of the indictment’s price manipulation and cornering counts. Although the CEA exemption does not necessarily inoculate Appellees from the wire fraud statute, we affirm the district court’s dismissal of the wire fraud counts.

I. Background

Appellees Mark…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. TRW Inc. v. AndrewsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. United States v. ValenciaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
  4. Dunn v. Commodity Futures Trading CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. United States v. KayCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. James BrooksCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
  2. Nevada v. United States Department of LaborDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2016
  3. Nevada v. United States Department of LaborDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2017
  4. 16 Front Street LLC v. Mississippi Silicon, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 2016
  5. United States v. George Grace, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API