Legal Opinion
Rosario v. Granada Mills, Inc.
District Court, D. Puerto Rico
Decided April 29, 1992No. Civ. No. 90-2258(PG)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
PEREZ-GIMENEZ, District Judge.
This is an action brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 as amended by the Pregnancy Discrimination Act of 1978, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, et seq. Plaintiff also prays that the Court use its pendent jurisdiction to entertain her claim based on Puerto Rico law. In the complaint, plaintiff alleges that she was submitted to a pattern and practice of discrimination by her employer, Granada Mills, Inc., and was eventually discharged therefrom for being pregnant. At this juncture in the proceedings, the defendant has moved for summary…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Wilma Cumpiano A/K/A Wilma Cumpiano Sanchez v. Banco Santander Puerto RicoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Pedrosillo Music, Inc. v. Radio Musical, Inc.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1993
- Soto v. Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day SaintsDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1999
- Virapen v. Eli Lilly, SADistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1992