Legal Opinion
Virapen v. Eli Lilly, SA
District Court, D. Puerto Rico
Decided June 25, 1992No. Civ. 90-1453(PG)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
PEREZ-GIMENEZ, District Judge.
Plaintiff, John Virapen,-alleges that defendants, Eli Lilly Export, S.A. and Eli Lilly Company (both hereinafter referred to as “Lilly”), discharged him in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 1981, Local Laws 100 and 80, and Puerto Rico contract law. Presently before the Court are Lilly’s motion for summary judgment and plaintiff’s opposition thereto.
The facts
Plaintiff is a Swedish citizen who was born in Guyana in 1943. From 1979 to 1988 he worked for Lilly affiliates in Copenhagen and…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Patterson v. McLean Credit UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Samuel Mesnick v. General Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Arabian American Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Santerre v. Agip Petroleum Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1999
- Otero-Burgos v. Interamerican UniverstiyDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2006