Legal Opinion
Leak v. Colburn
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 28, 1921No. Civ. No. 2385PublishedCited by 8 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtFinch, P. J.
The plaintiff recovered judgment declaring forfeited his agreement to sell certain real property to the defendant and restoring the plaintiff to the possession thereof.
Prior to the execution of the agreement the plaintiff had conveyed the property to the defendant for the sum of $2,200, a part of which had been paid. For reasons not material and concerning which the parties are not in agreement, the defendant reeonveyed the property to the plaintiff and the contract in question here was executed, by the terms of which the plaintiff agreed to convey the property to the defendant upon payment…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Glock v. Howard & Wilson Colony Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
- Schwerin Estate Realty Co. v. SlyeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Fresno Irrigated Farms Co. v. CanupisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
3Cited by8 opinions
- Barkis v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Barkis v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Clifford v. FleshmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- Estabrook v. SonstelieMontana Supreme Court · 1930
- Black v. Arnold Best Co.California Court of Appeal · 1954
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.