Legal Opinion

Chromalloy American Corp. v. Alloy Surfaces Co.

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided July 25, 1972No. Civ. A. No. 3640PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

LATCHUM, District Judge.

This suit was brought by Chromalloy American Corporation (“Chromalloy”) seeking injunctive relief and an accounting for damages against the defendants, Alloy Surfaces Co., Inc. and George H. Cook, for alleged infringement of United States Patent No. 3,257,230 (“the ‘230 patent”) entitled “Diffusion Coating for Metals” issued on June 21, 1966 to Richard P. Seelig and Richard L. Wachtell and assigned to Chromalloy. The defendants counterclaimed for a judgment declaring the ’230 patent invalid and unenforceable for a number of reasons.

Following…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Giordano v. McCartneyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967
  3. Chromalloy American Corp. v. Alloy Surfaces Co., Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1972
  4. Eastern Air Lines, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1953

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bell Telephone Laboratories, Inc. v. Hughes Aircraft Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1976
  2. Chromalloy American Corp. v. Alloy Surfaces Co., Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1973
  3. Matter of Transcontinental Energy Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Nevada · 1979
  4. Chromalloy American Corp. v. Alloy Surfaces Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1972
  5. Morton v. BestSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API