Legal Opinion

General Motors Corp. v. Abrams

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided January 18, 1989No. 86 Civ. 9193 (CSH)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

HAIGHT, District Judge:

Defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint and plaintiff’s cross-motion for summary judgment raise the issues of (1) whether a Federal Trade Commission consent order can ever preempt state legislation; and (2) if it can, whether a particular consent order negotiated by the Commission and plaintiff preempts New York’s “Lemon Law.”

I

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) was established by Congress in 1914 as an independent agency of the federal government. The FTC is empowered and directed by Congress to prevent, among other things, “[ujnfair…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. County Court of Ulster Cty. v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Jones v. Rath Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. State Energy Resources Conservation & Development CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. General Motors Corporation v. Robert Abrams, Attorney General of the State of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
  2. General Motors Corporation v. Robert Abrams, Attorney General of the State of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API