Legal Opinion

Cooley v. Lincoln Electric Co.

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided March 7, 2011No. Case 1:05-CV-17734PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM & ORDER

KATHLEEN McDONALD O’MALLEY, District Judge.

This products liability action was brought by Curt and Nancy Cooley against four manufacturers of welding rods: (1) Lincoln Electric Company; (2) Hobart Brothers Company; (3) The ESAB Group, Inc.; and (4) BOC Group, Inc. fik/a Aireo, Inc.

The case was assigned to the undersigned as related to the Multidistrict Litigation (“MDL”) known as In re Welding Fumes Products Liability Litigation, case no. 03-CV-17000, MDL no. 1535. The case proceeded to trial and the jury returned a verdict finding defendants liable to Curt Cooley. 1 The jury…

2Cases cited81 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003

76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Manor Care Inc. v. Tom DouglasWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Hale v. Enerco Group, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2012
  3. Frye v. Baptist Memorial Hospital, Inc.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2012
  4. The Bert Company v. Turk, M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
  5. Abbott v. E.I. du Pont de Nemours and CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2021

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API