Legal Opinion
State v. Hochman
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided November 24, 1982PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
188 N.J. Super. 382 (1982)
457 A.2d 1156
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
PAUL HOCHMAN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued September 14, 1982.
Decided November 24, 1982.
Before Judges MICHELS, PRESSLER and TRAUTWEIN.
Samuel L. Marguiles argued the cause for appellant.
Miriam K. Brody, Assistant Essex County Prosecutor, argued the cause for respondent (Irwin I. Kimmelman, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney; James R. Zazzali, former Attorney General, and George L. Schneider, Essex County Prosecutor, of counsel; Hilary L. Brunell, Assistant…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- County Court of Ulster Cty. v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Tot v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- United States v. GaineySupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- United States v. RomanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Sudduth v. Commonwealth County Mutual Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1970
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Harvester Chem. v. Aetna Cas. & Sur.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994
- Needham v. NJ Ins. UnderwritingNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989
- Christian v. OrmsbyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992
- State v. DavidNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1996
- Luizzi v. PRO TRANSPORT INC.District Court, E.D. New York · 2008