Legal Opinion
Aslakson v. Home Savings Ass'n
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided December 15, 1987No. C6-87-1497PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUSPENI, Judge.
This appeal arises from the grant of summary judgment in favor of respondents on appellants’ claim of tortious interference with contract. We affirm.
FACTS
Appellants Kurt S. and Jeanette B. As-lakson entered into a conditional sales contract to purchase a mobile home from Luxury Housing, Inc. on April 11, 1975. Subsequently the contract was assigned to respondent Home Savings Association (Home). 1
On September 13, 1979, appellants entered into a purchase agreement to sell the mobile home to Anita Lou Watson. Appellants knew that in order to assume appellants’ loan a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bennett v. Storz Broadcasting Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- Royal Realty Co. v. LevinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Lake Company v. MolanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- Johnson v. RaddeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
- 451 Corp. v. Pension System for Policemen & FiremenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Schumacher v. IhrkeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
- Minnwest Bank Central v. Flagship Properties LLCCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
- H Enterprises International, Inc. v. General Electric Capital Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1993
- STORAGE TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, — v. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., —Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
- R.A., Inc. v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.