Sanchez v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MORRISON, Judge.
The offense is murder; the punishment death.
In his first three grounds of error, appellant asserts that he was not properly *211warned of his right to counsel, and his right to terminate questioning as set forth in Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 426, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694, 10 A.L.R.3d 974.
Appellant was arrested, and his confession taken on May 4, 1966, before the decision in Miranda, supra, which was effective as of June 13, 1966, Johnson v. New Jersey, 384 U.S. 719, 86 S.Ct. 1772, 16 L.Ed.2d 882. Appellant’s trial began on April 10, 1967.
The record reflects that…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Johnson v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Boulden v. HolmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. Anthony Grace & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Webb v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
- Freeman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
- Phillips v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Ex Parte RossCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
- King v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.