Legal Opinion
Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided August 3, 2001No. Slip Op. 01-93; Court 99-08-00525PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RIDGWAY, Judge.
[Determination of U.S. Department of Commerce’s International Trade Administration on countervailing duty suspension agreement remanded for action consistent with this opinion.]
This action challenges a July 1999 agreement between the U.S. Department of Commerce (“Commerce”) and the Government of Brazil, suspending at the eleventh hour the investigation into alleged eountervailable subsidies received by three Brazilian steel exporters (“Brazilian Exporters”) 1 from the Brazilian Government. See Certain Hot-Rolled Flat-Rolled Carbon-Quality Steel Products From Brazil, 64…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- McKart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Wichita Board of TradeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Gilmore Steel Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1984
- Brother Industries, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Koyo Seiko Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007
- Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2004
- Usinas Siderúrgicas De Minas Gerais S/A v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2002
- United States Steel Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2005
- San Vicente Camalu Spr De Ri v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.