Legal Opinion
Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided February 17, 2004No. SLIP OP. 04-13, Court No. 99-08-00525PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RIDGWAY, Judge.
In the immortal words of Yogi Berra, “It’s deja vu all over again.” 1
Bethlehem II — the first opinion in this action — remanded to the U.S. Department of Commerce (“Commerce”) the July 1999 agreement between that agency and the Government of Brazil, 2 which suspended at the eleventh hour the investigation into alleged eountervailable subsidies received from the Brazilian Government by three Brazilian steel exporters (“Brazilian Exporters”). 3 See Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. United States, 25 CIT -, 159 F.Supp.2d 730 (2001) (“Bethlehem II”) . 4 Familiarity with that opinion…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hussey Copper, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1993
- Santa Fe Pacific Railroad Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1984
- McClatchy Newspapers, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, Northern California Newspaper Guild, Local 52, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States Steel Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2005
- Southern Cross Seafoods, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2023
- Ta Chen Stainless Steel Pipe Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007
- United States Steel Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2005