Legal Opinion
Star & Crescent Boat Co. v. County of San Diego
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 15, 1958No. Civ. 5865PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMussell, J.
This is an action for refund of county and city taxes paid by plaintiff under protest on three tugboats owned and operated by plaintiff. Recovery is sought for the sum of $13,836.92 in taxes assessed against the tug “San Diegan” and paid by plaintiff for the years 1955 and 1956; also for the sum of $17,397.31 in taxes assessed against the tug “Challenger” and paid by plaintiff for the years 1953, 1954, 1955 and 1956; and for the further sum of $11,467.95 assessed against the tug “Cuyamaca” and paid by plaintiff for the years 1953, 1954, 1955 and 1956. Plaintiff bases its right to recover said…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Gloucester Ferry Co. v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Sacramento Navigation Co. v. SalzSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- County of San Bernardino v. County of RiversideCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- White v. Steam-Tug Mary AnnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1856
- Cornell Steamboat Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1944
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Kaiser Steel Corp. v. County of SolanoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Golden Gate Scenic Steamship Lines, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Alalunga Sport Fishers, Inc. v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Smith-Rice Heavy Lifts, Inc. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- City of St. Helena v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.