Prado Navarette v. California
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Thomas
*395 After a 911 caller reported that a vehicle had run her off the road, a police officer located the vehicle she identified during the call and executed a traffic stop. We hold that the stop complied with the Fourth Amendment because, under the totality of the circumstances, the officer had reasonable suspicion that the driver was intoxicated.
I
On August 23, 2008, a Mendocino County 911 dispatch team for the California Highway Patrol (CHP) received a call from another CHP dispatcher in neighboring Humboldt County. The Humboldt County dispatcher relayed a tip from a 911 caller, which the…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by917 opinions
- Heien v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Charles Beal, Jr. v. James BellerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
- Jeff Courtright v. City of Battle CreekCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
- A.M. Ex Rel. F.M. v. HolmesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
- Kansas v. GloverSupreme Court of the United States · 2020
912 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.