Overocker v. Solie
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAVIES, Judge
Appellant, a judgment creditor, sought to collect a judgment, asserting there had been a fraudulent transfer under the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act, Minn.Stat. §§ 513.41-51 (1998). She contests the trial court’s grant of a directed verdict to respondents. We affirm.
FACTS
In December 1993, appellant Phyllis Ov-erocker received a jury verdict against respondent Danny Solie in the amount of $40,000, plus costs and interest. She attempted to recover the judgment through writs of execution and garnishment but was unsuccessful. Solie admits he has paid none of the judgment.
Appe…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hossfeldt v. DillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
- Nemanic v. Gopher Heating & Sheet Metal, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Claflin v. Commercial State Bank of Two HarborsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
- Eilers v. ConradtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
3Cited by2 opinions
- Kaiser-Bauer v. MullanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
- Ramsey County v. CrockarellCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001