Legal Opinion

Overocker v. Solie

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided July 27, 1999No. C8-98-1867PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAVIES, Judge

Appellant, a judgment creditor, sought to collect a judgment, asserting there had been a fraudulent transfer under the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act, Minn.Stat. §§ 513.41-51 (1998). She contests the trial court’s grant of a directed verdict to respondents. We affirm.

FACTS

In December 1993, appellant Phyllis Ov-erocker received a jury verdict against respondent Danny Solie in the amount of $40,000, plus costs and interest. She attempted to recover the judgment through writs of execution and garnishment but was unsuccessful. Solie admits he has paid none of the judgment.

Appe…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hossfeldt v. DillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
  2. Nemanic v. Gopher Heating & Sheet Metal, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  3. Claflin v. Commercial State Bank of Two HarborsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
  4. Eilers v. ConradtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kaiser-Bauer v. MullanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
  2. Ramsey County v. CrockarellCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API