Legal Opinion

Eilers v. Conradt

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided September 17, 1888PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the district court for Ramsey county, where the action was tried by Simons, J.

1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.

The defendant’s husband (who is plaintiff’s judgment debtor) personally performed all of the carpenter work upón a dwelling-house, built by her upon her own lot. She has, with her husband and children, resided therein since March 25,1885. We are not advised whether said carpenter work was performed as a gratuity or otherwise, but its value is found at $(500, no part of which has been paid. The husband had no other claim upon, interest in, or connection with, said house and lot, except as follows: In the year 1882 defendant purchased — wholly upon time — lots 7 and 8 in block 19 in one of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hossfeldt v. DillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
  2. Abbey v. . DeyoNew York Court of Appeals · 1871

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Martin v. TuckerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  2. Overocker v. SolieCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
  3. Archer v. MoultonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API