Legal Opinion

Fletcher v. Mead Sch. for Human Dev., No. Xo5 Cv 96-0152138 S (Jan. 8, 2001)

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided January 8, 2001No. XO5 CV 96-0152138 SUnpublished

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO ERASE CASE FROM JURY DOCKET (#198)

This motion furnishes the court with an opportunity to discuss the effect of an untimely claim to the jury trial list filed pursuant to General Statutes § 52-215. The defendant has filed a common law motion to erase the case from the jury docket. This appears to be the proper procedure. A motion to strike a case from the jury docket is not CT Page 419 permitted. Practice Book §§ 10-39 through 10-45.

Prior to October 1, 1996 the Practice…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Gupta v. New Britain General HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  2. McCutcheon & Burr, Inc. v. BermanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  3. Home Oil Co. v. ToddSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  4. Girard v. WeissConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
  5. Kuser v. OrkisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API