Legal Opinion

Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Peck

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 4, 1909No. 6,331PublishedCited by 2 opinions

From Cass Circuit Court; Joseph M. Rabb, Special Judge. Action by Charles M. Peck against the Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago and St. Louis Railway Company. From a judgment on a verdict for plaintiff for $4,000, defendant appeals. Transferred to Supreme Court (see 43 Ind. App. 316). Transferred to Appellate Court (see 172 Ind. 19). Retransferred to Supreme Court. (Retransferred to Appellate Court [see 172 Ind. 562], Retransferred to the Supreme Court [see 45 Ind. App. —].

1Per curiam

This cause was tried by a jury upon the issues presented by the fourth and fifth paragraphs of the complaint, answered by a general denial. Prom a judgment in favor of appellee, appellant appealed to this court, assigning as errors the action of the court in overruling its demurrers to the fourth and fifth paragraphs of the complaint, and in overruling its motion for a new trial.

This is the second appeal from a judgment in favor of appellee. Pittsburgh, etc., R. Co. v. Peck (1905), 165 Ind. 537. On the former appeal the Supreme Court held the paragraphs of complaint upon which the cause was…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. LightheiserIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co v. CollinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Benson v. ChristianIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Dowell v. Talbot Paving Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. PeckIndiana Supreme Court · 1905

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. PeckIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Blair v. City of Fort WayneIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API